When the defendant submits a rule (b)(6) motion to dismiss,
The issue of whether a judge can switch a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss to a Rule 12(b)(2) motion involves understanding the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Rule 12(b)(6) pertains to motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. This means that if the complaint, even if taken as true, does not provide sufficient legal grounds for a claim, the court can dismiss it under this rule. Conversely, Rule 12(b)(2) addresses the defense of lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendant.
While a court cannot directly convert a 12(b)(6) motion into a 12(b)(2) motion, it can consider arguments contained within the broader context of the motion to explore issues related to jurisdiction, but that typically requires separate attention to the defendant's contacts with the forum state. Since a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) focuses on the merits of the complaint itself, and a motion under Rule 12(b)(2) focuses on jurisdictional issues, they serve distinctly different purposes.
If a judge determines that a Rule 12(b)(6) motion involves factual matters that include jurisdictional issues, the court may require that these matters be addressed in either a distinct motion or a hearing. Hence, while the judge does not "switch" from one type of motion to another, the judge can take jurisdictional concerns into consideration separately or as part of other proceedings.
For further detailed legal understanding, you can refer to the resources provided by Cornell Law School on Rule 12 and other relevant legal blogs, such as the following links:
- Cornell Law School on Rule 12
- Thomson Reuters on FRCP Rule 12(b)(6)
- E-Discovery on conversion of motions
Sources


Related Questions
Work fast from anywhere
Stay up to date and move work forward with BrutusAI on macOS/iOS/web & android. Download the app today.