Please find me California case law that is pro-landlord and

Based on the search results, here is a summary regarding California case law and legal standards pertaining to a landlord's right to enter a rental unit for repairs under California Civil Code section 1954.

California Civil Code section 1954 outlines the conditions under which a landlord may enter a tenant's rental unit. The law specifies that entry is permissible for several reasons, including emergencies, necessary repairs, inspections, and showing the property to prospective tenants or purchasers. The need for proper notice before such entry is emphasized, typically requiring a 24-hour written notice unless the situation is an emergency (FindLaw).

For landlords, it’s understood that there can be technicalities regarding the timing of entry - even if entry occurs slightly outside the specified timeframe of the notice served. However, case law directly addressing minor violations of timing related to entry under this code is less clear and might vary based on specific circumstances of each case. Such nuances often depend on whether the tenant's right to quiet enjoyment was breached or if they suffered any undue harm as a direct result of the landlord's actions.

The resource from Azibo provides broader insight into how this law governs the landlord-tenant relationship and could potentially highlight ways in which landlords can argue that minor delays do not constitute a material violation of the code (Azibo).

It is beneficial for landlords to consult legal experts to ascertain their rights and the best practices for entry under these provisions. A detailed review of relevant case law would be necessary to find specific judgments that support the landlord’s position while addressing the nuances of timing as potentially not being a substantial violation.

For practical applications, landlords may refer to resources explaining the nuances of Civil Code section 1954 in a general sense, such as this guide about landlords' entry rights, which can contextualize the law further (Martinez Law Center).

Given the complexity and potential variations in rulings, a specific case law citation directly addressing minor timing issues would be useful; however, those findings were not provided in the search results.

In conclusion, while there are supportive legal frameworks for landlords regarding entry for repairs, detailed case law specifically favoring the argument that slight deviations in timing do not constitute a material violation under California Civil Code section 1954 may require further legal research or professional legal consultation.

Work fast from anywhere

Stay up to date and move work forward with BrutusAI on macOS/iOS/web & android. Download the app today.