Google V. Gonzalez Llc
The text describes the case of Gonzalez v. Google LLC, where the plaintiffs accused Google of aiding and abetting terrorism by allegedly conspiring with ISIS. The case was dismissed by the district court based on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which provides immunity for content posted by third parties. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the dismissal. However, the family of Gonzalez appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which declined to rule on the case in 2023. This case is significant as it is the first Supreme Court case to address the scope of Section 230 in the context of social media companies and their responsibility for terrorist activity.
In the case of Google v. Gonzalez LLC, the plaintiffs accused Google of aiding and abetting terrorism by allegedly conspiring with ISIS. The case involved a contentious issue related to the responsibility of social media companies for terrorist activities. The district court dismissed the case citing Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which provides immunity for content posted by third parties. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the dismissal. Subsequently, the family of Gonzalez appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which declined to rule on the case in 2023. This case is significant as it is the first Supreme Court case to address the scope of Section 230 in the context of social media companies and their responsibility for terrorist activity.
If you would like more detailed information about any specific aspect of this case or if you need other related details, feel free to ask.
Work fast from anywhere
Stay up to date and move work forward with BrutusAI on macOS/iOS/web & android. Download the app today.