Facts Of This Case

Summary: In the case of Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Company, Gray sued Ford for personal injuries and after a six-month jury trial, the verdicts were in favor of the plaintiffs. The trial court awarded the plaintiffs compensatory damages and the case was affirmed by a California appellate court. Ford tried to introduce a statistical study, but it was denied. This case was just one of many lawsuits filed against Ford for design flaws in the Pinto resulting in fuel tank fires. The jury awarded millions in compensatory and punitive damages, making it a famous car accident case.

In the case of Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Company (1981), the facts revolve around a lawsuit filed against Ford for personal injuries resulting from an accident. The lawsuit stemmed from the design flaws in the Pinto, which caused fuel tank fires. After a six-month jury trial, the verdict was in favor of the plaintiffs. The trial court awarded compensatory damages to the plaintiffs, and this decision was affirmed by a California appellate court.

This case was just one of many lawsuits filed against Ford for the design flaws in the Pinto, and it gained significant attention due to the substantial compensatory and punitive damages awarded by the jury. The case reflects an important legal precedent in product liability and safety standards within the automotive industry.

Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co., 119 Cal.App.3d 757, 174 Cal. Rptr. 348 ...Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Company - ppt download

Related Questions

Work fast from anywhere

Stay up to date and move work forward with BrutusAI on macOS/iOS/web & android. Download the app today.