The text expresses that the Constitutional Court is not authorized to resolve "vertical" disputes over competence - this is not necessary due to the unitary structure of the state. It emphasizes that the Constitutional Court does not have the competence to review court decisions, including the interpretive resolutions of the Supreme Court. Article 83 § 1 of the Constitution only allows for the adoption of interpretive resolutions to unify divergent case law, not resolutions passed during full sessions of the Constitutional Court (Article 13). These competencies have been viewed as distinct. The European Court of Human Rights accuses the Constitutional Court of ruling on the unconstitutionality of combined chamber resolutions. The Constitution does not provide a basis for the Constitutional Court to rule on the unconstitutionality of Supreme Court resolutions.