2. Carpenter V. United States (2018)
The landmark United States Supreme Court case, Carpenter v. United States, concerned the privacy of historical cell site location information. The court ruled in a 5 to 4 decision that the government is required to obtain a warrant before accessing an individual's cell phone location history. This decision was made after wireless carriers produced over 12,000 location points for petitioner Timothy Carpenter's phone without a warrant. The court held that Carpenter did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in this information because he had shared it with a third party.
The case Carpenter v. United States (2018) involved a significant privacy issue regarding historical cell site location information. The United States Supreme Court ruled in a 5 to 4 decision that the government must obtain a warrant before accessing an individual's cell phone location history. This decision stemmed from a situation where wireless carriers provided over 12,000 location points for petitioner Timothy Carpenter's phone without a warrant. The court's judgment was based on the understanding that Carpenter did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in this information, as he had shared it with a third party.
Sources
![Carpenter v. United States (Decided June 22, 2018) | Subscript Law](https://subscriptlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/CarpentervUSDecision-1.png)
![Opinion analysis: Court holds that police will generally need a ...](https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/bSC180622_Roberts-002.jpg)
Related Questions
Work fast from anywhere
Stay up to date and move work forward with BrutusAI on macOS/iOS/web & android. Download the app today.